Evaluation of Some Merfu Riwayas Which Are Source Can Not Be Determined in The Matter of Mâtürîdî's Ta'wīlāt

Imam Māturīdī used the riwayas as a source of tafsir in Ta'wīlāt al-Qur'an and mentioned his views as basis. Most of these riwayas were mentioned movable from Prophet and Sahaba. It has been claimed that the source of some of the riwayas in the work titled Tawilat al Quran, which was investigated by Bekir Topaloğlu and Ahmet Vanlıoğlu, could not be determined. It has been stated that some riwayas have a thought in sources in similar meanings, but these riwayas cannot be identified in the sources with the some sentences. The number of hadith that are definitively determined to Prophet but cannot be source determined is about twenty-three. In our study, we dealt with the claim of not reaching these riwayas, the original of which could not be determined. Our aim in doing this was to question whether the riwayas really originate. Thus, it was determined whether this was originally found in the previous study or whether Imam Māturīdī was using unrealistic riwayas. In this article we will discuss the source value of these riwayas, Imam Māturīdī uses these how rumors and produce comment from these riwayas, and the approach to these riwayas. In addition, as a source of tafsir, we will also evaluate Māturīdī's sources in relation to these riwayas and relationship with the tafsir that he originated from.